sohotrightnow: ([buffy] like some soldier undaunted)Jules ([personal profile] sohotrightnow) wrote,
@ 2011-03-26 11:21 am UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Current mood:geeky
Current music:you're all right, there's nothing wrong, self sufficience please and get to work
Entry tags:i am crazy:what is your childhood trauma, movie:sucker punch
OKAY SO FIRST OF ALL. Like, I have already gotten into the habit of disclaiming just about everything I say re: Sucker Punch with an explanation of how this hits not only my narrative buttons, but my srs bzns trauma-related buttons as well. Plus it is actually a really fucking awesome action movie, objectively. So everyone should read my thoughts on this movie while keeping those two things in mind, that it's objectively a great action movie (which is a genre that not everyone likes) and that it hits so many of my personal buttons that it's hard if not impossible for me to really deal with this on an objective level just yet.

And as silly as this sounds and embarrassed of myself I am for saying this, I am not actually sure I can deal with a lot of criticism of this movie right now. Partly because a lot of the things I have seen complained about hit a couple of very deep-seated issue-related buttons for me, such that I end up taking criticism really really personally. To the point where, kind of hilariously, I have even been considering taking a few days away from LJ/DW until whatever initial discussion there may be has died down. Yes that is how ridiculous I am, w/e w/e I do what I want.

That said, [personal profile] inlovewithnight tells me that there has already been some stuff surrounding this movie in fandom that will enrage me, much of it from people who haven't even seen the movie! And, okay, first of all, leaving aside the deeper issues I have, this is not going to be to everyone's tastes, simply because it's very much a straight-up action movie ([personal profile] baked_goldfish and I agreed after last night's viewing that leaving aside the politics of it, this was quite simply one of the best action movies we'd seen in ages) and again, that's a genre that not everyone's into! So if you're not into action movies you probably will not be super into this. And as for the ~issues~, I will absolutely acknowledge that plenty of people have trauma that will manifest in ways that make this movie unviewable for them! But I would like to state clearly the other side of that coin, that it's possible for people's trauma to manifest in ways that mean this will be an extremely satisfying and, hell, therapeutic movie for them. Brains are complex! No two traumas are the same! We all deal with it in different ways and respond to it in different ways!

...oh god that was only supposed to be a few sentences of defensiveness. /o\ Long story short, I totally understand being critical of this movie, from a pure cinematic POV and from a feminist one, but I am not sure I am capable of dealing with that because of the ways that it resonates with me (I love action movies and also LOL ISSUES). I realize it is silly but that is part of the fun of being crazy. I hear people be like "but the costumes are gross" and I have to fight really hard not to yell YOUR FACE IS GROSS, SHUT UP, THIS IS FUCKING ART, I AM GETTING DEFENSIVE SO HARD I'M ABOUT TO BREAK MY MACBOOK FUCKING AIR!!!!!!! Yes, again, I completely realize this is irrational and hypocritical, but guess what, that is how the crazybrain works! W/E W/E I DO WHAT I WANT, at least I am working to confine this to my own journal! :D? :D?

OKAY HAVING GOTTEN ALL OF THAT OUT OF THE WAY.

More on the beginning. I'd noticed yesterday that Babydoll doesn't speak through the entire opening; in fact, the first of the girls to speak is Sweetpea, and she does so when she is acting out Babydoll's lobotomy onstage. (AND that is to say stop it, get that thing away from me, undo these straps and get me out of here, and then to talk about how she doesn't understand this, that it's not hot at all, it's creepy and gross to think that anyone would be turned on by it.) But going back even further -- the movie opens on Babydoll on a stage that looks like her bedroom, and then pans around and turns it from a stage into her actual bedroom. She doesn't speak for the entire opening, and even before the acting-out-the-lobotomy happens, when Babydoll first goes into the theater, what's happening onstage? It's a bedroom, with a blonde girl sitting on a bed. In the background, it's explained that the stage is used as a set for therapy, so the girls can recreate what happened to them, at which point, Babydoll locks eyes with the girl sitting in the bedroom set, and it's Sweetpea.

ALSO something about Blondie and Amber's deaths was bothering me after my first viewing, and first I was like "okay, something's off here, because this was all in Sweetpea's head, but when Blue kills them, Sweetpea is locked in the closet, so how does she know about it?" BUT! When Babydoll first says she plans to escape, in the dormitory, someone -- I want to say Blondie -- says something to the effect of "the last time anyone tried, three girls died". I don't remember the exact wording, but the key here is that three girls died. At which point it all fell into place: not only does she hold herself responsible for her sister's death, but she also blames herself for the other girls' deaths as well.

Sidebar: WHY THE FUCK have both the theaters I have been in found Blondie's death entertaining? At the midnight showing people freaking cheered, and last night people were laughing. LIKE WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK PEOPLE, UGH. [personal profile] quelle_surprise was like "yes, she ratted them out, but DID YOU NOT NOTICE THE CIRCUMSTANCES?" It was horrifying and such a statement on powerlessness in the patriarchy, on how you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't, and even if you "play by the rules" (which, um, it was kind of forced out of her, first of all; it's not like she voluntarily went to them, so even that is a really powerful statement about how you're not really playing by the rules because you have any choice in the matter to begin with) you're fucked. Which...hm. That reminds me so much of this post that I am really going "huh" to this.

More on the costuming! Like, we were discussing them, and [personal profile] inlovewithnight said "they were just dancing the line of exploitation so furiously that I think they finally just obliterated it entirely". To which [personal profile] baked_goldfish responded "yes, the costumes were skimpy -- but also, they were tearing shit up," which is also key, I think. Like, sex as means of enforcing power is such a central theme in this movie that it seemed obvious, to me, that reclaiming sexuality would be a part of kicking ass and reclaiming agency. Plus, also, like, part of why I love Buffy so much is that she is allowed to be traditionally feminine and still be a hero. Like, Ripley is great, but she never really resonated with me the way Buffy and Sailor Moon did, because I had the same problem with her I had with a lot of the heroines of books I read, where I felt like the message was that in order to be a female hero who kicks ass, you had to eschew femininity.

And obvs it is not cool to be prescriptive about any kind of gender presentation, and I understand how refreshing the tomboyish heroines and Ripley are to women who don't feel particularly attached to traditional femininity! So I am absolutely not knocking those types of characters as important and valuable, because shit yes they are. But I was surrounded by stories where you either wore pretty dresses and were useless or you hated dresses and were a hero, and it got to a point in my childhood where I felt like, well, if I want to be a worthwhile woman I have to be a tomboy, and that is no more helpful than saying that every female hero has to kick ass in high heels and a push-up bra, so basically the "it's not cool to be prescriptive re: gender presentation" thing works both ways. Or, more eloquently, everything in the "gender: femininity" tag at Sociological Images. Especially, to bring this back to the movie, a quote from this post, about outside photographers' experiences documenting internment camps during WWII:
According to Sue Kunitomi Embrey the chair of the Manzanar Committee, [Ansel] Adams hoped to capture the despair of camp life in order to stir some public sympathy for Japanese Americans but was frustrated by all the primping and posing Japanese Americans did when he was photographing.

[...]

...I hope that images of smiling and fashion-conscious Japanese American women...adds to and deepens our appreciation of the small acts of feeling, creativity, and resistance that happen everyday in spite of huge limitations. In an act as seemingly trivial and trite as smiling for the camera, these women interrupt and take some control of the historical, political, and visual frames through which they're being viewed.
Emphasis mine, but yeah, basically I point to that and say YES YES THAT, ALL OF THAT.

ALSO, which I noticed this time, in none of the fantasy "mission" sequences are the attacking hordes using sex as a weapon, threatening rape or leering or whatever, and neither do the girls do any kind of honey-pot thing within the missions, using their costumes as ways of distracting people. For that matter, the enemy soldiers are steampunk WWI automaton-zombie things, orcs, and robots. They are never even presented as having any kind of human personality or sexuality. So on the one hand, yeah, why would they even need skimpy clothes, if we're not going to make that an issue? But sex as means of enforcing power is such a central theme that IDK, for me it made perfect sense. Yes, you can be sexy just for you; you are not asking for it when bad things happen to you just because you were wearing fishnets and displaying cleavage; you can be sexy -- you can be sexual -- and do it on your own fucking terms. And again, it is kind of impossible for me to be completely objective about this because LOL PROJECTING but I felt like within the context of the film it was actually perfect.

Which, discussing that before the movie I was explaining how I am having to give a loud and frequent disclaimer, in talking about this movie, that it hits so many of my buttons that possibly everyone should take my reviews with a grain of salt. And I said "yeah, I realized when I was getting defensive in drafting a post that I used the phrase 'maybe I'm giving Zack Snyder too much credit' and that's sort of where I said okay, I have to step back, because I seriously just wondered if I was giving Zack Snyder too much credit". But then we came out of it and [personal profile] baked_goldfish was like "THAT WAS AMAZING", and then said that she couldn't believe she was saying this of any director, let alone Zack Snyder, but clearly he needs to write his own movies all the time. So, you know, me projecting all over it does not exclude the possibility of it being legit good! She said it was one of the best movies she'd seen this year, and we agreed that it was the best action movie either of us had seen in ages, so. Plus [personal profile] redbrickrose pointed out the whole death of the author thing and reminded me that whether he meant it as male-gazey or not didn't really matter if I was getting that strong a reclamation of agency vibe from it.

And of course there's the "you have all the weapons you need, now fight" line, which, if all you see is the trailers, I could see having a problem with that because it seems like it's kind of victim-blamey taken in the context of the rest of what's going on, at least in the trailers? But what isn't clear from the trailers is that that line isn't meant for during -- it's meant for after. It's not about what you do when it happens to you, it's about recovering from the trauma and fighting your way past it. Which is wonderful, because yes, yes it is a fight. [personal profile] inlovewithnight said that for the first fantasy sequence she was kind of :/ and thinking "yeah, this is a pretty shallow empowerment fantasy" and then said she thought about that later and was like "...of course it was a shallow fantasy, that's the point: when you're in a world where you don't have any power, you need a fantasy where you have all the power." So, like, yes, from the trailers alone it's going to look like kind of a shallow Hollywood take on "empowerment", but that is basically the entire point, because that is what you need. In short, this movie is actually very conscious that its fantasy sequences look like shallow fantasy empowerment, and that is exactly what they are supposed to seem like, because this is not a movie about fighting hard enough to prevent them from victimizing you: it is about recovering after they victimize you.

...actually, looking at all of that, and my "the point is you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't" take on Blondie's death in particular, not only is this movie about the patriarchy and misogyny, it is even more specifically about rape culture. Which, holy shit, not only did a dude make an action movie about rape culture and make it awesome, that dude was Zack fucking Snyder. I am not sure what to do about all of this.

OH MAN I HAVE SO MANY FEELINGS ABOUT THIS MOVIE, I CAN'T EVEN. Okay it is time for lunch. And then possibly I will bake something. IDK. Also, [livejournal.com profile] burntcopper pointed me towards a streaming copy of the soundtrack. So if anyone wants to listen to that, just go here and scroll through the carousel until you get to it!

Ughhhh where are all the icons, I need them. ALL OF THEM. Maybe I will even try my hand at writing fic? IDK where to even start with it, though, because there is SO MUCH FIC that needs to exist for this movie.


(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

helens78: A man in a leather jacket, seated on the ground, looks up hopefully. (x: erik looking up)


[personal profile] helens78
2011-03-26 05:36 pm UTC (link)
I'm still totally interested in seeing it. Maybe this weekend I'll get to it! ^_^

(Reply to this


anonymous_sibyl: (Coffee & Books)


[personal profile] anonymous_sibyl
2011-03-26 06:25 pm UTC (link)
I've been reading what you and 'Night have been saying about this movie and I am dying to see it. Off to moviefone!

(Reply to this


baked_goldfish: (bruce/patti)


[personal profile] baked_goldfish
2011-03-26 09:12 pm UTC (link)
One of the other things that I really really liked about it was that one of the realities was a brothel - and the brothel was awful and we were supposed to see it as awful. Everyone was a slave who hated being there, you never saw anyone actually have sex with any of the women, and yes, they danced, but we never really see them dance for the men. There is nothing for the male gaze, no nod to men who might want to see Babydoll do her amazing dance or anything else.

Also, re. Blondie's death, and actually Rocket's death as well, my take on it was that Babydoll and Sweetpea were the only real people out of their band of sisters; when Don Draper is talking to Dr. Gorski, they talk about all the drama Babydoll brought in the few days she was there. She stabbed an orderly, set fire to a closet, and helped Sweetpea escape, but there's no mention of other patients dying, and there's no implication that Blue did anything other than take bribes, forge Gorski's name, and probably rape girls. Which is bad enough, but I don't think we're supposed to think he killed anyone. I guess I thought Sweetpea had imagined the others as part of her fantasy, either in part or in full.

Last edited 2011-03-26 09:21 pm UTC

(Reply to this)  (Thread


sohotrightnow: ([buffy] but you're just a girl)

blanking out is too much work, so HERE BE SPOILERS


[personal profile] sohotrightnow
2011-03-26 10:13 pm UTC (link)
YES. Like, they never go completely into detail, and yes, the surroundings for the "shows" etc. -- at least, the spaces where the public gets to go -- are fairly pretty, but there's no romanticization of the brothel and the realities of it in the least.

there's no mention of other patients dying, and there's no implication that Blue did anything other than take bribes, forge Gorski's name, and probably rape girls

YYYYY! I had noticed the first part, but I had NOT connected it with the second part.

I do sort of think the other girls may have been real at some point, and in some form? Partly because in every single fantasy sequence, Amber has the same role. First one, she's got the mecha, second one she's flying a plane, third one she's flying a chopper, and in each one she provides cover fire and gets them out, and sometimes even in, safely (first time she gets into the mecha and goes off to provide air cover, second time they jump out of the plane into the fortress while she provides air cover, third time she actively flies them into the train and then flies them out again, including her and Babydoll catching Sweetpea in the process). So I sort of think there must have been something that happened in which Amber was the getaway driver, and she, Rocket, and Blondie were all killed and Sweetpea blames herself for not helping them.

But that is not actually mutually exclusive with Sweetpea and Blondie being the only real people of the girls, I feel? Like, it is entirely possible, and even probable, that all of the shit that this stands in for is not only Blue raping them in the hospital, but whatever happened to land Sweetpea there in the first place.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


baked_goldfish: (bruce/patti)

Re: blanking out is too much work, so HERE BE SPOILERS


[personal profile] baked_goldfish
2011-03-26 10:19 pm UTC (link)
First one, she's got the mecha, second one she's flying a plane, third one she's flying a chopper

Tangent: this is why I can't fully get behind the "they're wearing skimpy clothes! Male gaze!" arguments. They're wearing skimpy clothes but you almost never see Amber's costume, because she's always in a mech or seated in the cockpit of a plane. And I think it's Blondie who takes the gunner position in the plane, right?

Anyway, yeah, I think there's an argument to be made that the girls are based on some kind of reality, but I'm not sure that it has anything to do with Sweetpea. Did you notice that the bunny on the mech is the same as Babydoll's sister's toy? That leads me to think that Amber has more to do with Babydoll than Sweetpea - or that Babydoll has something else to do with Sweetpea that's not immediately apparent. There are parallels between the cook trying to rape Rocket and the stepfather trying to rape Babydoll's sister, for instance.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


fox1013: a quote from Melina Marchetta's "On the Jellicoe Road", picture from Lost (Lost - Trips and Journeys)

Re: blanking out is too much work, so HERE BE SPOILERS


[personal profile] fox1013
2011-03-26 10:37 pm UTC (link)
I WAS THINKING ABOUT THAT TOO.

My assumption was that the girls were there, and they interacted enough to be stand-in figures in her fantasy, but weren't part of anything that happened: they were just pieces in the theater used to act out the drama.

Also, I am now not certain of what happened with Babydoll at all, because it kind of feels like the fact that her main issue was ACCIDENTALLY GETTING HER SISTER KILLED WHILE TRYING TO PROTECT HER, which screams "Sweetpea and Rocket" to me.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


sohotrightnow: the top of a swimming young woman's torso. ([stock] above the world)

Re: blanking out is too much work, so HERE BE SPOILERS


[personal profile] sohotrightnow
2011-03-28 06:33 pm UTC (link)
Also, I am now not certain of what happened with Babydoll at all, because it kind of feels like the fact that her main issue was ACCIDENTALLY GETTING HER SISTER KILLED WHILE TRYING TO PROTECT HER, which screams "Sweetpea and Rocket" to me.

RIGHT? Normally I kind of despise ~*~*~what's the REAL story~*~*~ thing as a framing device, but in this one it's like a DELIGHTFUL VIOLENT KALEIDOSCOPE, where every time I turn it I get something fabulous and new to look at!

One of the main things I wonder about is how Sweetpea ended up there in the first place. We've got Rocket's story, but it's their mother they explicitly mention her returning to; I think there's, like, one mention of "our parents" and then it's all "Mom"/"your mother". So I do wonder how much overlap there is between Babydoll's intro and Sweetpea's backstory.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


layangabi: (books)

Another reply Re:--SPOILERS


[personal profile] layangabi
2011-04-16 11:34 pm UTC (link)
...I wrote a previous comment that I had to delete because it was capslocky and ragey and unfair. But it does bother me that in a story where abused women band together, where they recover themselves through fantasy,
one intepretation being floated is that three of them were never real. In particular, that Amber, the only Asian woman in the group, the one who's depicted consistently as the one who flies them in and out of danger, the one who watches their backs, never had active part in their fighting back. Or that she was, at best, incidental.

It bugged me that Amber died. But it skeeves me she's being erased by the implication she wasn't real, and that she didn't play an active role in getting at least one of her comrades out.

Also: note to sohotrightnow. Hi! My partner and I saw the movie last night and she linked me to your review of the film. We loved it, we had the same reactions you did (although thankfully, no one at our theater cheered at Blondie's death) and wanted to read awesome meta about the film.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


lizbee: (Random: The Pigeon is overstimulated)


[personal profile] lizbee
2011-03-26 09:20 pm UTC (link)
WHY IS IT NOT OUT HERE UNTIL 7 APRIL?

Although I'm increasingly convinced that I should see it by myself, 'cause damn, some of my RL friends are squee harshers.

Obviously pre-emptive squee is foolish, and I shouldn't count chickens, but honestly, any time I see the words, "You are a bad feminist if you like ___________" I'm queuing up and hoping I'll like ___________.

(Reply to this


ide_cyan: Dalbello peering into a screen (testing)


[personal profile] ide_cyan
2011-03-28 05:41 am UTC (link)
You all are making me want to *re*watch this movie. Except I'd want to be able to mute Blue whenever he's monologuing, because, urgh.

(Reply to this


(Deleted post)
sohotrightnow: the top of a swimming young woman's torso. ([losers] if you think I'm strange)

Re: Some thoughts:


[personal profile] sohotrightnow
2011-03-28 05:18 pm UTC (link)
1. I go back and forth on whose head it's in; IDEK if I'll ever make up my mind 100% on what's "really" going on there. That's one of the things I like about it!

2. She does. I noticed it my second viewing, because I remember being startled by it. It's very specifically that three girls died. Which is one of the reasons that, while it may not be "really" in Sweetpea's head, I do think her narrative is being woven in alongside Babydoll's.

(There's also the fact that in each of the three mission sequences, Amber plays the same role -- she's got the mecha in the first, flies the plane in the second, and flies the chopper in the third.)

3. Surprised laughter, maybe, but cheering? The midnight showing I was at, and to a lesser extent the second viewing, people were applauding and cheering when Blue shot Blondie. I'm willing to maybe grant that in some cases laughter was just out of shock, but that's hardly cheering happily. And there's a difference between a shocked/horrified giggle and the sustained laughter that I was hearing at both shows.

4. I'm not sure why you felt the need for scare quotes, and I'm kind of offended by the apparent need to belittle what I've repeatedly acknowledged is part of a deeply personal interpretation springing not just from my tastes in media but from my own trauma (it's not "'reclaiming femininity' or whatever", but reclamation of sexuality and agency, particularly sexual agency).

But leaving that aside and regarding my personal interpretation vs. yours...I'm curious why you single out Wonder Woman. Superman doesn't wear armor either, and his outfit doesn't leave much more to the imagination than hers does -- artists may portray them in different ways, but neither of them wear armor, and for much the same reasons: they're superhuman, and this is fantasy. Given the way the girls are thrown around and bounce back without so much as a scratch on them, I assumed that within the fantasy world there were some measure of superhuman abilities, or at least they were far enough above everyone else in terms of skill/ability/strength that something like full-body armor isn't something they need to worry about.

That the setup is that of a military mission doesn't make them military scenes. If we're concerned about realism, why were they using shiny modern guns in the dragon sequence? [livejournal.com profile] revertigo also had a post about this here, and to play off one of her points, yeah, my ass-kicking fantasies do occasionally involve me wearing impractical costumes, because they're fantasies. I mean, the odds that I'm going to develop superpowers tomorrow are pretty much nil anyway, do I really need to include that much more ~realism~ by giving myself full-body armor?

I can't really believe he was thinking of all these female empowerment issues when writing this.

Maybe not. But as a friend was saying when we were discussing the movie before going into the theater (my second viewing, her first), death of the author -- authorial intention only matters so much, if at all. If I say that this movie is actually a metaphor for Zack Snyder being sick of the cupcake trend and wanting people to make the switch to donuts instead, and I can back that up with citations from the text, that's a valid interpretation, regardless of whatever Snyder himself says. Personally, I don't completely subscribe to that theory 100% of the time and I do think it can be useful to consider other works by a given author/their personal history, but it's only a jumping-off point, not the be-all end-all. People pick up attitudes and ideas and works aren't created in a vacuum, and when I and multiple rape survivors I know believe that this works as a rape trauma recovery narrative, then yeah, I think that interpretation is valid.

On that note, that was one of the reasons I've been so surprised by it coming out -- comparing the attempted rape scene in Watchmen to the ones in this movie, they were completely different. [personal profile] impertinence and I discussed the difference between the scene in Watchmen and the one in this movie here. The attempted rape scenes in SP were, cinematically, extremely different from the one in Watchmen, which, yeah, is why I do suspect that Snyder was attempting to comment on rape culture with this film. We can agree to disagree on how successful he was, and before I watched this movie I'd've laughed if you told me I'd be saying there was any such thing as not giving Zack Snyder enough credit, but I really don't think you are. That Watchmen had rape in it, too, doesn't mean that he just likes rape; the amount of rape and the way it was used in Watchmen was completely different than the ways it's used in SP. Where the Comedian's attempted rape of Sally in Watchmen was absolutely appalling and one more really faily exploitative attempted rape scene that objectifies the woman and eroticizes her pain and terror, the scene in the kitchen in Sucker Punch, where the cook tries to rape Rocket, was quite possibly one of the most cut-and-dry portrayals of rape I've ever seen in popular culture: it's not about desire, it's not about love, it's only about sex in the way that murdering someone by shooting them in the head is about the smell of gunpowder. It's about power, and sex is merely the means of exerting that power.

Basically I'm not sure why you're saying I'm wrong because I'm taking this too personally and getting my ~feelings~ mixed up with the text when I've...said from the beginning that I take this very personally and that it resonates really deeply with a lot of my feelings? If you consider that as making my reading invalid, I'm not sure why you feel like it's worth discussing with me when I've made it clear multiple times in multiple posts that I'm not, at present, capable of a reading of this film that's not colored by my own history and the very personal places this movie hits me. I sort of feel like you're telling me that my reading of this movie is wrong because of the very things I've said from the beginning are why I read it this way, so I'm not quite sure, if that's the case, what I'm supposed to say.

Last edited 2011-03-28 05:21 pm UTC

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


astaroth: (pic#1156684)

Re: Some thoughts:


[personal profile] astaroth
2011-03-28 05:52 pm UTC (link)
I never said you were wrong, I was just giving my own views.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


sohotrightnow: the top of a swimming young woman's torso. ([buffy] society's only protection)

Re: Some thoughts:


[personal profile] sohotrightnow
2011-03-28 06:05 pm UTC (link)
And I responded, so there you go!

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent)  (Thread


kerrypolka: Contemporary Lois Lane with cellphone (girl reporter: Lois Lane)

Re: Some thoughts:


[personal profile] kerrypolka
2011-03-29 11:37 am UTC (link)
ILU BB.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent


majesdane: (liars → one true love.)


[personal profile] majesdane
2011-03-29 12:21 am UTC (link)
I found this via a link from someone else, but just ... this is me slow-clapping for you and this entire post because it is brilliant and thoughtful and I am going to save this post and just direct people to it the next time I see someone complaining for all the reasons you mentioned here.

(Reply to this


false_alexis: BAMFs of Sucker Punch (Sucker Punch)


[personal profile] false_alexis
2011-03-29 11:10 pm UTC (link)
I found you from a link from a link, and I just wanted to say how MUCH your post resonated with me! Because I have all sorts of problems with this movie, but at the same time it hit home so very strongly and I feel really protective and defensive and now I want everyone else to understand how awesome and reclaiming it can be.

(Reply to this


nympholepsy: (ariel)


[personal profile] nympholepsy
2011-03-30 09:32 pm UTC (link)
Got here from a series of links on LJ, just so you're not like wtf who is this person? but,
In conclusion, I stand by my "it's Inception but a lot less dull and about misogyny" assessment.
LMAO THANK YOU all my friends are gaga for Inception and I am just bored to tears by it. But I fucking loved Sucker Punch, for many of the reasons you outline here, especially about identifying with heroines who present themselves as traditionally feminine. Like, when people go on about how gross and degrading the costumes in Sucker Punch are, it feels like they're saying that about ME. Plus I don't think that, in the action sequences, the girls were dressed particularly revealingly? Other than Babydoll, they were all pretty covered up, that I recall. You'd just see a splash of exposed belly or some cleavage. I show that much skin when I'm working out, ffs. They also didn't just look ~*sexy*~, they looked tough.

(Reply to this


egregiouslypink: (tv ⇎ gg ⇎ go and tell your white knight)


[personal profile] egregiouslypink
2011-04-02 09:18 am UTC (link)
Directed here from the above commenter, actually!

I just want to like... take this post and hug it because after seeing Sucker Punch tonight I can't... really respond to this movie on anything but an emotional level? Like, I felt like this movie got it. Just... hi, that's my life and my issues and my past, and ffs they're FINALLY BEING DEALT WITH in a way that doesn't make them seem hot or whatever, this movie LITERALLY SAID TO THE AUDIENCE 'this is fucked up and wrong and sick' and I am rambling but just. Yes.

I really connected to this movie on... really emotional, visceral levels. And I really cannot fucking believe I'm saying this because this is Zach freaking Snyder, not exactly the dude who comes to mind when you think 'who will make an amazing movie about rape culture and how it fucks women up before they even know the name for what's keeping them down' but people are not giving him, and Sucker Punch, the credit they both deserve.

ANYWAY YES. The costumes were kickass and tbh? Not even all that skimpy. A hint of cleavage here and there, some midriff... I'm not feeling the slut shame-y aspects of a lot of critique for this movie. Why can't women be sexy and still be powerful? And for that matter, in the movie the outfits --especially in the action sequences, not the bordello (which is supposed to feel exploitative, imo, but I guess ymmv)-- aren't like HEY BOYS, HOT FOR ME NOW? they're like "sup, we're fucking amazing and hot and also about to kick you in the junk." It's not for the men. It's for them.

Idk, babble babble babble tl;dr I love this post.

(Reply to this



(18 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)